By Helena Handbasket – January 27th 2021

In September 2009 Newsweek magazine published an article titled, ‘The Case For Killing Granny’, which was followed up by Bill Gates infamously mentioning Death Panels in a TV interview stating that, We’re not allowed to have that conversation.”

But of course, he was having that conversation by bringing up that term and so the ‘conversation’, or intention, was put out into the public domain by a guy who would happily see every person not part of his billionaire elitist club simply wiped off of planet Earth to save it for him and his criminal cabal.

The ‘case’, a much abused and incorrectly defined term these days, was that, instead of spending money on elderly patients or those with a low life expectancy, that money should be used to keep public sector employees in jobs. In the interview nurses were the example. Teachers are of course another subgroup of public employees.

At the time Gates was never adequately challenged and barely a word of criticism was uttered in the mainstream media. The conversation was now out there.

Gates is of course the most under qualified medical expert on the planet and yet he is given a media platform across the globe to spout his murderous philosophy for all to hear without a dissenting voice challenging his hegemony on information or expertise.

Moving forward to the current hoax pandemic which Gates has ‘predicted’ for years. (In other words known what was coming. (He is not a God despite his own delusions of grandeur) He has also stated that, “The next one will get their attention”.  Again, this would seem in plain English to be pre-knowledge of a coming deadly outbreak. Or should I say outcome of something else? Or is it simply a threat? I would suggest all three are possibilities. We’ve already seen the early ‘side’ effects of his much touted experimental mRNA vaccine.

What will the later effects be?

Gates it seems has fingers in every pie of the current ‘pandemic’ hoax and is prospering exponentially on the back of it, as are his multibillionaire cartel club members. He has stated on the public record that he receives a 20:1 return on investment in vaccines. It seems that ‘philanthropy’ has also been redefined to mean ‘immoral profiteering from other people’s misery’. But why should that come as any surprise from anything Gates is involved in?

How does giving money away makes you richer?

If only the general public could give away all their money and miraculously see their wealth double. But that aside, Gates is also the arch hypocrite in many other facets of human life, of which he cares nothing, except presumably his own. Psychopaths care not about ANYONE else. They will kill their own to save themselves.

When Gates mentioned killing Granny to keep nurses employed, he already knew that many such nursing services would become automated.

One such example recently came to light, although it has been on the go for years; Sophia the Robot.,a%20distinguished%20career%20in%20marketing.

This machine has been given ‘citizenship’, ‘personhood’ and ‘human rights’ in Saudi Arabia, a country not known for any such interest in human rights. The machine needs to be careful what it says and better not drink alcoholic lubricating oil in public either or it could be in trouble and may lose a sparkplug or battery in the Saudi torture chambers.

Joking aside, this is the future Gates sees in education and healthcare. Teachers and nurses on many levels will become obsolete, just as the machinery of the past has become so with new technology replacing the old.

Human beings are now the old and obsolete ‘technology’ which needs to be assigned to the scrapheap of humanity which will be left in the wake of the WEF’s ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’.

Gates is heavily invested in ‘virtual’ teaching with AI robots replacing ‘virtual’ teachers at every level. Huxley’s Brave New World didn’t even go this far. There were at least genetically modified ‘human’ teachers in the mix.

Artificial Intelligence is just as it sounds; Artificial. Children will not be ‘taught’ anything of significance, and certainly not the real facts on anything. They will be programmed to think in a certain way, although the word ‘think’ itself will also have to be redefined. Thinking for yourself is also obsolete.

Healthcare, another redefined term in Gates’ lexicon meaning ‘rationed treatment and shorter lifespan, even if you’re healthy’ will become another ‘new normal’. Again, it will not be humans determining what treatment you receive, if any, it will be AI robots specifically programmed to make life or death ‘decisions’ based on a pre-programmed set of specific criteria to determine if you get treatment or not. These ‘decisions’ will not be based on any human empathy or moral obligation to treat the sick. They will simply be made, in Gates’ own maniacal mind, in terms of, ‘The Case for Killing Anyone’ based on their economic value to his dystopian society, under the same label of Death Panels, which he’s not allowed to talk about, but as mentioned above, he did, and he did it deliberately.

It is becoming abundantly clear that Gates and his cabal, under the guise of ‘sustainability’ regardless of these barbaric billionaires using more resources a day or a week than you or I will use in a lifetime, (the hypocrisy is astounding yet again) have decided that they have no further requirement for the vast majority of humanity, the useless eater class, and have decided in their psychopathic wisdom to eliminate us.

Herein lies the crux of the matter.

If the general idea of these fanatics, as they’re continually telling us, is for the greater good and that democracy must prevail, when they have no intention of allowing any form of democracy to take hold, however flawed, doesn’t the majority have the upper hand in deciding who lives and dies under a democratic system?

If Gates and his psychopathic cabal want to kill off the majority, and I assume the majority don’t want to be killed off, shouldn’t there be a vote on such an important matter; for the greater good of course?

If there was such a vote then I think it’s pretty clear who would come out on top; Dominion voting machines and mail in ballots aside.

There is a clear case for eliminating the eugenicist class. It’s called ‘Self Preservation’.

“I object to all punishment whatsoever. I don’t want to punish anybody, but there are an extraordinary number of people who I want to kill. Not in any unkind or personal spirit. But it must be evident to all of you, you must all know half a dozen people at least, who are no use in this world; who are more trouble than they are worth. And I think it would be a good thing to make everybody come before a properly appointed board just as he might come before the income tax commissioners and say every 5 years or every 7 years, just put them there, and say, sir or madam, now will you be kind enough to justify your existence? If you can’t justify your existence; if you’re not pulling your weight in the social boat; if you are not producing as much as you consume or perhaps a little more, then clearly we cannot use the big organization of our society for the purpose of keeping you alive, because your life does not benefit us, and it can’t be of very much use to yourself.”

― George Bernard Shaw

How about turning the words of eugenicist George Bernard Shaw on their head?

We don’t have to make a case for executing them. We just make sure they get nothing to enable their survival. We may even humanely allow them to live if they can come to us and justify their existence and utility to the human species. If they cannot do so, then they are clearly no use to society or to themselves and could find themselves being humanely gassed to alleviate the pain and anxiety of their obvious miserable existence.

How about we let Granny decide?

Essential viewing – Watch ‘The Soviet Story’ documentary in full here: