In the dark days of slavery, masks were used as form of control over the slaves. It not only made them more compliant but it also prevented them communicating with their unfortunate fellow slaves. This was rightly seen as a form of physical and psychological torture.
For thousands of years these torture devices were used to silence women but were more generally used to keep slaves in line and compliant with their masters.
Modern mask wearing to prevent the spread of microscopic virus particles is not only unscientific, it is also a form of compliance to so-called ‘experts’ who claim that these surgical or N95 masks actually work as they claim.
They certainly do not, and therefore we must come to the conclusion that there is another reason behind these mandatory diktats that we must all wear these muzzles or gags.
These come from people with no medical qualifications or training, and therefore no authority to give orders to wear such medical equipment. There also appears to be no medical exemptions and therefore those with underlying health conditions are at serious risk of major health complications as a result of simply going about their daily business of buying essentials items for life, such as food, medication etc…
But these masks are a health hazard for all who are forced to comply.
There are many studies showing issues from oxygen depletion to heart rate problems, CO2 toxicity through re-inhalation of exhaled breath, headaches, fatigue, blood acidity risking cancerous cells and other health issues.
The case for wearing masks is in serious doubt as outlined in the above report…
The two potential side effects that have already been acknowledged are:
(1) Wearing a face mask may give a false sense of security and make people adopt a reduction in compliance with other infection control measures, including social distancing and hands washing.
(2) Inappropriate use of face mask: people must not touch their masks, must change their single-use masks frequently or wash them regularly, dispose them correctly and adopt other management measures, otherwise their risks and those of others may increase.[3,4]
Other potential side effects that we must consider are:
(3) The quality and the volume of speech between two people wearing masks is considerably compromised and they may unconsciously come closer. While one may be trained to counteract side effect n.1, this side effect may be more difficult to tackle.
(4) Wearing a face mask makes the exhaled air go into the eyes. This generates an uncomfortable feeling and an impulse to touch your eyes. If your hands are contaminated, you are infecting yourself.
(5) Face masks make breathing more difficult. For people with COPD, face masks are in fact intolerable to wear as they worsen their breathlessness. Moreover, a fraction of carbon dioxide previously exhaled is inhaled at each respiratory cycle. Those two phenomena increase breathing frequency and deepness, and hence they increase the amount of inhaled and exhaled air. This may worsen the burden of covid-19 if infected people wearing masks spread more contaminated air. This may also worsen the clinical condition of infected people if the enhanced breathing pushes the viral load down into their lungs.
(5B) The effects described at point 5 are amplified if face masks are heavily contaminated (see point 2)
(6) While impeding person-to-person transmission is key to limiting the outbreak, so far little importance has been given to the events taking place after a transmission has happened, when innate immunity plays a crucial role. The main purpose of the innate immune response is to immediately prevent the spread and movement of foreign pathogens throughout the body. The innate immunity’s efficacy is highly dependent on the viral load. If face masks determine a humid habitat where the SARS-CoV-2 can remain active due to the water vapour continuously provided by breathing and captured by the mask fabric, they determine an increase in viral load and therefore they can cause a defeat of the innate immunity and an increase in infections. This phenomenon may also interact with and enhance previous points.
In conclusion, as opposed to Greenhalgh et al., we believe that the context of the current covid-19 pandemic is very different from that of the “parachutes for jumping out of aeroplanes”, in which the dynamics of harm and prevention are easy to define and even to quantify without the need of research studies. It is necessary to quantify the complex interactions that may well be operating between positive and negative effects of wearing surgical masks at population level. It is not time to act without evidence.
The fact is that this has clearly nothing to do with preventing the spread of a virus, a virus that has never been isolated and which is of the same viral family as the common cold.
This is why so many alleged tests, (there is no real evidence that these tests have been carried out and certainly plenty of evidence to show they are virtually useless anyway) are returning positive results.
The CDC admits this on their own website, and yet, we’re told that non-medical authoritarians are ‘following the science’.
What do your results mean?
If you test positive
- A positive test result shows you may have antibodies from an infection with the virus that causes COVID-19. However, there is a chance a positive result means that you have antibodies from an infection with a virus from the same family of viruses (called coronaviruses), such as the one that causes the common cold.
This is the elephant in the room as far as these so-called positive tests are supposed to be a cause of concern regarding high infection rates of Covid-19 being used, yet again, to shut down society and force us all to live like muzzled sheep locked up in our individual pens, formerly known as our homes.
This rate of infection is entirely bogus and based on nothing more than the corrupt opinions of corrupt medical and political whores.
Infectious diseases do not change their characteristics depending on what part of the world they exist in. Nor do they know what a one way system is or measurements of distance. The same infection causes the same symptoms. So why have other countries who have not gone down the road of compulsory lockdowns, mask wearing and social distancing not have the same reaction from politicians and pseudo-medical personnel or the same infection or mortality rates?
The simple truth is that there are pathological liars in all walks of life, with politicians being at the forefront of that particular phenomenon, closely followed by the medical profession, particularly big pharma corporations. Psychopaths (control freaks) are rife in both professions.
The whole world knows that politicians lie and that big pharma has vested interests in keeping fear rampant in the general population to suit their particular political ideological agenda and financial interests.
When will the public open their eyes to the reality of this fact that these control freaks don’t care about you and are deliberately and enthusiastically damaging your health as you comply with their insane diktats?
Or will they wait until a blindfold and collar are added to their mandatory dress code just prior to their injection with a highly dangerous experimental DNA altering vaccine?
They may be stupid creatures, but even sheep aren’t blind.